Backgrounds/Aims This study aimed to compare the outcomes of liver resection (LR) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within the Milan criteria who were not eligible for liver transplantation.
Methods We retrospectively analyzed 483 patients with multinodular HCC within the Milan criteria, who underwent either LR or TACE as an initial therapy between 2013 and 2022. The overall survival (OS) in the entire population and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients who underwent LR and TACE and achieved a complete response were analyzed. Propensity score (PS) matching analysis was also used for a fair comparison of outcomes between the two groups.
Results Among the 483 patients, 107 (22.2%) and 376 (77.8%) underwent LR and TACE, respectively. The median size of the largest tumor was 2.0 cm, and 72.3% of the patients had two HCC lesions. The median OS and RFS were significantly longer in the LR group than in the TACE group (P<0.01 for both). In the multivariate analysis, TACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.81 and aHR, 2.41) and large tumor size (aHR, 1.43 and aHR, 1.44) were significantly associated with worse OS and RFS, respectively. The PS-matched analysis also demonstrated that the LR group had significantly longer OS and RFS than the TACE group (PS<0.05).
Conclusions In this study, LR showed better OS and RFS than TACE in patients with multinodular Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A HCC. Therefore, LR can be considered an effective treatment option for these patients.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Survival Prediction and Treatment Decisions in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Deep Learning-Based Radiomics Approach Xiaoqin Wei, Jun Xiao, Ying Liu, Chaofeng Yang, Ziren Luo, Mingyue Tang, Xiaowen Chen British Journal of Hospital Medicine.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Liver resection versus radiofrequency ablation or transarterial chemoembolization for early multinodular BCLC-A hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis Maria F. F. Viana, Arthur A. Braga, Lucas B. Carvalho, Danilo C. M. S. Vasconcellos, Bianca C. M. R. Alexandrino, Felipe J. F. Coimbra Journal of Liver Cancer.2026; 26(1): 157. CrossRef
Low Tumor Burden Predicts Benefit from Transarterial Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Extrahepatic Metastasis: A Nationwide Cohort Study Jaejun Lee, Hyun Yang, Keungmo Yang, Ji Won Han, Pil Soo Sung, Jeong Won Jang, Si Hyun Bae Liver Cancer.2026; : 1. CrossRef
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Noninferiority Trial of Stopad® Versus Tachosil® for Hemostasis After Liver Resection Seung Yeon Lim, Gi Hong Choi, Jin Hong Lim, Ho-Seong Han, Yoo-Seok Yoon, Hae Won Lee, Boram Lee, Yeshong Park, MeeYoung Kang, Jinju Kim, Hyelim Joo, Jai Young Cho Cancers.2025; 17(5): 757. CrossRef
Comparison of initial treatments for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: an observational study based on a nationwide survey Sang Jin Kim, Woo Kyoung Jeong, Hyung-Joon Han, Gyu-Seong Choi, Kyun-Hwan Kim, Jongman Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(5): 279. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of the immediate results of surgical treatment in patients with early (BCLC A) and intermediate (BCLC B) stage hepatocellular carcinoma B. I. Sakibov, D. V. Podluzhnyi, Yu. I. Patyutko, E. A. Moroz, O. A. Egenov, N. E. Kudashkin Surgery and Oncology.2025; 15(2): 52. CrossRef
Artificial intelligence for multi-time-point arterial phase contrast-enhanced MRI profiling to predict prognosis after transarterial chemoembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma Lanlin Yao, Hamzah Adwan, Simon Bernatz, Hao Li, Thomas J. Vogl La radiologia medica.2025; 130(10): 1517. CrossRef
Exploring the role of liver resection as a first-line treatment option for multinodular BCLC-A hepatocellular carcinoma Joo Hyun Oh, Dong Hyun Sinn Journal of Liver Cancer.2024; 24(2): 126. CrossRef
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is recommended as the first line treatment option
for the patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B hepatocellular carcinoma
(HCC), however, treatment strategy and evaluation of effects after TACE has not been fully
established. Recently, sub-stage of BCLC stage B has been proposed and validated, but it
should be validated including a large number of the patients and its refinement should be
discussed. We have validated the sub-stage of BCLC stage B (B1-B4) by comparing overall
survival after TACE, and there was no statistically significant difference in overall survival
after TACE between B1 and B2. After excluding the patients with Child-Pugh point 7 from B1,
the overall survival was significantly better than that of B2. Therefore, up-to-seven criteria is
shown to be a reliable tool for the treatment strategy in the patients with intermediate stage
of HCC. Refinement of sub-stage of BCLC stage B has been proposed by some other institutes,
and it is important to establish novel treatment strategy for the patients with BCLC stage B
after TACE to improve the prognosis of the patients after TACE, and to define the best timing
for conversion to sorafenib or liver transplantation should be discussed. (J Liver Cancer
2016;16:7-11)
Background/Aims Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC)
intermediate stage includes a highly heterogeneous population. Here, we aimed to subclassify
hepatocellular carcinoma with BCLC intermediate stage for better prognostification. Methods Between 2003 and 2008, 325 patients who were newly diagnosed as HCC with
BCLC intermediate stage were considered eligible. Tumor factor and liver function were used
for sub-classification. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method with a
comparison by log-rank test. Results A total of 325 patients with intermediate stage HCC were analyzed. Patients with
tumor size ≥7 cm, tumor number ≥4 and Child-Pugh class B had the worse OS compared
to those with tumor size <7 cm, tumor number <4 and Child-pugh class A, respectively (all
P<0.05). These three variables affected the OS independently from multivariate Cox regression
analysis (all P<0.05). So, using these three variables, patients were finally sub-classified as
those with fulfilling none of three factors (B-a), one of three factors (B-b), two of three factors
(B-c) and all of three factors (B-d) with the median OS of 39.2, 20.6, 12.0 and 8.3 months with
statistical significances (all P<0.05 between B-a and B-b, between B-b and B-c, and between
B-c and B-d), respectively. Conclusions Sub-classification of HCC with BCLC intermediate stage may be useful in not only
prognostification but also guidance of treatment strategies. (J Liver Cancer 2016;16:17-22)